Natalie Kalmus was born in 1882 and has 404 credits on IMDB.
Just to give you an idea how incredible that is, Steven Spielberg has 299 IMDB credits, Alfred Hitchcock clocks in at 204 and James Cameron, 151 (come on James, get it together).
So who was Natalie Kalmus and how did this woman, born before the Hollywood boom even existed, rack up such an impressive cinematic CV?
Well, Natalie Kalmus gave us colour film.
Seriously, watch any Technicolor Film from the 1930s and 1940s and you will see her name!
The creation of colour film
Natalie was married to Herbert Kalmus, who was the founder and president of Technicolor. A graduate of MIT, Herbert founded the company with several of his friends in 1914.
Now, Technicolor was far from the first colour film technology maker. From 1909, British born company, Kinemacolor was the market leader, offering Hollywood tech for creating colour film.
Their system transformed black and white film by projecting it through alternating between red and green filters.
An example of an early Kinemacolor film, 1908
As you can see, there is colour, but it’s far from true to life.
Though there was scope for Kinemacolor to evolve, it was never going to move much past the heavy red and green hues.
So Herbert Kalmus and his pals at Technicolor ditched the green red method and spent the next 2 DECADES trying to come up with a better way to make colour film.
Sadly, everything Herbert tried was either ridiculously expensive, needed a ton of experienced people to operate or just didn’t create the desired effect.
But by 1932 Herbert had the system perfected! Essentially this new system worked from start to finish; from using refracted light in the camera to bathing the film strip in coloured dye (this is a really basic description, click here for more detail)
Finally, colour film was a go! Sadly… nobody wanted it.
The Great Depression had just hit and no one wanted to take a punt on Technicolor and its expensive services. This was not an economy in which to take a gamble!
That is, unless you were Walt Disney…
In 1932 Herbert Kalmus convinced Walt Disney to try out his new tech. Disney agreed, with the caveat he had total animation monopoly on Technicolor until 1935 (classic Disney business move: smart and oh so scary)
Disney’s Silly Symphonies, Flowers and Trees short, was the first animation by the studio to use Technicolor.
Released in 1933, it was an immediate hit with audiences and critics alike.
The worth of Technicolor had been proved and soon enough all the major studios were desperate to make the move to colour.
Disney’s Silly Symphonies, Flowers and Trees, 1933. Dancing Fauna just casually revolutionising film
The race to make the next hit colour picture sounded one hell of a pay day for Technicolor.
You see, studios couldn’t buy Technicolor equipment outright, they had to rent everything. This massively boosted the companies bottom line.
BUT there was one huge issue:
Quality control
The possibilities of what could be achieved with this level of colour were endless and as such, film makers were chomping at the bit to get to play with this new tech.
They wanted to use all the crayons in the box, at the same time. As anyone who has ever seen a child’s drawing can attest – that is not always a good thing.
But one person stood between directors and the future of film looking like a toddlers psychedelic nightmare doodle.
That person, was Natalie Kalmus.
Meet Natalie and this totally not at all sexist newspaper article about her…
Natalie wanted to ensure that Technicolor lasted as both a company and an industry standard. She believed that colour had the potential to be more than a money grabbing fad. It could totally revolutionise film as an art form.
But that couldn’t happen if film makers were able to just throw the entire kitchen sink at the screen!
So when you hired Technicolor equipment, you also had to hire Natalie Kalmus.
Natalie served as colour supervisor on almost every Technicolor film from 1934 – 1949.
A former art student and passionate art lover, Natalie was the perfect person to steer the future of colour film. Although Herbert Kalmus and Natalie had secretly split by 1922 (though they continued living together) she’d been right there during Technicolor’s decades long inception, often serving as it’s on screen test model.
There was nobody who understood the tech and its artistic capabilities better.
In 1935, Natalie wrote her magnum opus: ‘Colour Consciousness’
Rather than just throwing everything at the screen, Natalie wanted colour to be carefully orchestrated through the film. In the same way that a films score underpins the story, emotions and individual characters, so would colour.
Through Colour Consciousness, Natalie asked the filmmakers working with Technicolor to delve through art history, looking at how these painters used colours to tell their stories.
By doing this, Natalie was hammering home the importance of people’s psychological reaction to specific hues, as well as how good they’d look on screen.
As an example, lets take The
Wizard of Oz. In the film, Dorothy’s shoes aren’t just changed from their original silver, because red will look better!
Yes they pop on that yellow brick road, but they also contrast as the polar opposite to the Wicked Witches uncanny and sinister looking green skin.
The ruby slippers are that particular shade of ruby red because it’s one that creates a feeling of lively fun, rather than just a few shades darker, which can conjure thoughts of blood!
That’s a lot of thought on what’s essentially a prop. But it clearly worked, because decades later, those shoes are still world famous!
Natalie didn’t just boost a stories plot through colour, she also made the whole film a visual feast.
As we have covered, Technicolor was a totally new visual tech and black and white methods for camera, art design, lighting, costuming, and well, everything else would not work here!
There was a lot of scope to get things wrong! Seriously, if colour film isn’t done right it has the capability to make some people actually feel physically ill (kind of like how 3D films did a couple of years ago…)
NOT ON NATALIE’S WATCH!
So once more Natalie looked to art for inspiration and taught entire crews how to change their work to match this new tech.
She showed Art Departments how mix of warm and dark tones to make previously flat sets look deep. Lighting crews how ow to use shadow and coloured lighting together. And schooled directors in working within in a specific palette to create a colour scheme that didn’t detract but rather worked harmoniously to tell the story.
This is why the advent of colour films gives us these gloriously detailed sets. Sumptuous costuming and the first use of colour coding to set a character or mood.
If this sounds like big deal, it’s because it is. All of this is a HUGE part of the foundation for film making as we know it today.
An example of Natalie’s work on 1948s The Red Shoes. Seriously, go watch this film, it’s just bloody fantastic and every single shot is piece of art in itself
BUT not all of Hollywood’s power players were down with Natalie and her new techniques.
Much of this was due to the old boys club not loving the fact that a woman was coming onto their set and having a say.
Add to that the fact that Natalie had no problem entering a shouting match with Hollywood’s leading male directors, and you have a powder keg just waiting to explode.
Thus, Natalie was loathed by the vast majority of the filmmakers she worked with.
David O Selznick was so riled up by Natalie that he actually tried to have Gone With The Wind shot in black and white, just to get her off his set!
Another film maker, Allan Dwan later summed up his opinion on Natalie:
‘Natalie Kalmus is a bitch’
Mighty big words you’re throwing about there Allan…
But, did all this hate deter Natalie?
Nope!
Instead of shying away, she built up a huge department of colour supervising specialists and led the charge of colour film-making.
Natalie had a direct hand in almost every colour film made for over a decade. THAT’S HUNDREDS AND HUNDREDS OF FILMS!
It’s very much because of Natalie, her techniques and her work that Technicolor was a success. It didn’t die out as a fad, but proved colour was key to making films. Not only bringing in crowds but becoming a vital tool in making GREAT cinema.
This meant that studios were happy to continue paying more money to make colour pictures over black and white, during economic low periods like WW2.
Thus, Natalie Kalmus is arguably the reason that colour cinema sustained.
A classic example of Natalie’s work, quite literally taking film from black and white to colour
So then, if Natalie Kalmus is so great then why did she stop working and why haven’t we heard of her?
Well for 2 reasons:
The old boys club finally won
By the late 1940s, Natalie had pissed too many of Hollywood’s powerful men. She started to be removed from sets, gradually working less and less as rumours of her ‘hysterical’ outbursts spread.
This was exasperated by:
2. Her alimony case against Herbert Kalmus
Though Natalie and Herbert split in the early 1920s, their breakup was pretty amicable, they even continued living together! All was well, until the 1940s, when Herbert decided to remarry. Essentially kicking Natalie out.
So she went to court in pursuit of alimony.
After all, Herbert was a very rich man and much of that wealth was thanks to Natalie. She wanted what was hers.
Sadly the courts didn’t agree and Natalie’s case was thrown out of court. Upon the news, she broke down, begging the judge for ‘justice’.
As she sobbed, photographers snapped away and soon enough this was all over town:
Los Angeles Times article detailing Natalie Kalmus ‘hysteria’ in court.
After the fallout of the trial and the ongoing rumours of her ‘hysterical’ nature, Herbert stripped Natalie of her job at Technicolor.
Natalie never recovered from this career blow and she didn’t work in film again.
She died quietly in 1965, mostly forgotten by the industry she helped build.
But Natalie’s film legacy lives on. Her work is the building blocks for modern Hollywood. So next time you watch a colour film, be it Singing In The Rain, Gone with Wind, The Red Shoes, or the latest blockbuster, thank Natalie Kalmus.
This was interesting, where can I find out more? Well, there’s nobody better than the woman herself to show you how enduring Natalie Kalmus work is. So I suggest you check it her amazing, Colour Consciousness, which you can do, for free, HERE.
It’s officially the run up to Christmas, and you know what that means:
Time to bust out all of the old school Christmas films!!!
There’s just one problem though. All the true old school Christmas classics kind of have to be saved until Christmas Eve (it’s festive law). So without the It’s A Wonderful Life’s of the world, if you want a black and white film fix, you’re stuck with the 1938 version of Christmas Carol (which is a classic and all, but it’s not the right version of Christmas Carol…)
Truly the only adaptation of Victorian literature that matters
But suffer no longer! I’ve gathered four of the best old (we’re talking released in 1945 or earlier!) films, that you probably haven’t seen. All are fun and most importantly batshit enough to keep you entertained no matter what level of turkey based food coma you’re in.
So crack open the wine and prepare to mock and love these films in equal measure!
1 – The Shop Around The Corner, 1940
Watch It Because…truly nothing says Christmas like Jimmy Stewart in a suicidal Christmas film!
What’s it about?Set in Budapest, Hungary (as nifty a way for the film studio to seem Euro positive during WW2) the film follows a group of shop-workers; specifically Jimmy Stewart and Margaret Sullivan, who can’t stand each other… but *gasp* they are actually secretly falling in love with each other as anonymous pen pals!
Please don’t judge this film by the nightmare painting of Jimmy Stewart
What makes it so good?If you haven’t guessed yet, 1990s classic, You’ve Got Mail is based on this. BUTthe original has two major bonuses over the remake:
1. The romance is waaaay off: Seriously, the romance here is less ‘I bet they have really good angry sex’ and more ‘I bet they have a lot of angry sex followed by crying’. The hatred between these two is real! They should in no way be together and if it doesn’t end in divorce within a year, I’ll eat my santa hat.
‘I probably wouldn’t have shouted at you so much…probably’
2. It’s festive AS F!! Set in snow capped Hungary with a Christmas Eve kissing session thrown in for good measure, this film is all kinds of cosy!
Plus it also stars Frank Morgan AKA the wizard of oz!
Look at this guy, his face just screams cosy Christmas!
What’s the downside?Well *spoiler alert* er…The Wizard tries to kill himself. Frank Morgan plays the shop’s owner, who through the course of the film starts off fine, then suspects his wife of having an affair, has a breakdown and attempts suicide.
Yeeeeah…maybe not one for the kids
Don’t worry though, two days after his suicide attempt the Wizard is back at the shop and everyone just kind of glosses over what happened…making this the ultimate Christmas film for everyone with a massively dysfunctional family.
Where can I watch it?It’s available to rent for not very much at all on Amazon (included in some Prime packages), YouTube and Google Play.
2 – Christmas in Connecticut, 1945
Watch This Because…this screwball comedy with a female lead, somehow manages to both be WAY ahead of its time and yetsomehow really outdated…it’s quite an impressive feat!
The MOST acting ever captured on one film poster
What’s it about? Barbara Stynwyck plays a career gal writer whose homemaking column has transformed her into the 1940s Martha Stewart.
The only problem? She can’t even make toast!
But when her boss forces her to host a (cute) military hero at her (imaginary) farm for Christmas, Barbara has no choice to make her homemaking fantasy life a reality. Cue much screwball comedy, fake babies, kitchen mishaps and a love triangle.
The film also contains some of the best/worst double entendres ever committed to film.
So what makes it so good?Well not to be this person…but Barbara’s wardrobe is pretty great. Plus *spoiler ahead* Barbara doesn’t magically become great at homemaking or ditch writing to become a wife. By the end she gets a promotion and gets off with the guy who is totally fine with the fact she can’t cook, clean or change a baby (but he can!)
So what’s the downsides?Well the film is a bit all over the place. Luckily it’s a truly old school screwball comedy so it gets away with it. However, I’d recommend tucking into some mulled wine and creating a Christmas in Connecticut drinking game to get you through the more nonsensical bits.
Where can I watch it?Available on Youtube, Amazon Prime and Google Play.
3 – It happened on fifth avenue, 1947
Watch It Because… It’s the most screwed over Christmas film in history. It lost it’s director to It’s a Wonderful Life and was beaten to Oscar Glory by Miracle on 34th Street. Basically it had zero luck!
Now finally re-released after decades in the wilderness, this sweet (and weirdly socialist) movie looks set to make an iconic Christmas comeback!
What’s it about?A rich businessman leaves his plush pad vacant whilst he is out of town over Christmas. Except it’s not empty…because a homeless man has broken in and set up a fancy temporary home there!
Said homeless man invites round his mates, including a a newly homeless war vet and a young female drifter, who turns out to be the real home owners daughter and she’s just pretending to be homeless (bit of a twat move but there we go)
Soon the rich homeowner comes back (now pretending to be homeless, because why not) and learns that about human plight, compassion and to use his wealth to help others.
I can’t point out who here is actually homeless and who is a prick pretending to be
What’s good? It’s basically a very socialist Christmas! Honestly, one of the story lines involves a group of homeless veterans trying to fund their plan to build mass affordable housing. The film couldn’t be more humanist and socialist if it tried!
The downside? Good luck watching this if you live outside the USA. For real, there is literally no way to watch it legally and that’s super bloody frustrating!
Where can I watch it?Well if your in the US, you can rent it for a pittance on YouTube, Amazon or Google Play. Not in the US… happy streaming!
4 – Meet me in St Louis, 1944
Watch It Because…nothing says Christmas quite like Judy motherfucking Garland.(And although apparently this is on in America constantly over Christmas,the same cannot be said for the UK)
What’s it about?The film spends a year following the Smith family, a middle class family at the turn of the century. From spring to winter, we watch as the family are torn apart, pull back together again and generally learn all about family values and love etc etc.
Presenting the most camp and loud poster to ever grace the world
Whats good?It’s generally a cracking musical. You have fun numbers, ear worms a plenty and of course – Miss Judy Garland.
On a festive note, the film contains the classic song: Have Yourself a Merry Little Christmas. Arguably one of the most under appreciated festive numbers around. Now – For those who don’t know…Have Yourself A Merry Little Christmas is the perfect mix of both melancholic and hopeful. During Meet Me in St Louis it’s sang right after this happens:Why yes, that is an emotional little girl murdering a snowman with what looks like a gun.
Judy Garlands character sings ‘Have Yourself a Merry Little Christmas’ to soothe her upset sister (following snowman decapitation gate) With the songs lyrics reminding us that no matter how bad things are right now, things will get better. But until then, if we band together with those we love we can ‘muddle through somehow.’
My god doesn’t that seem like the end of year anthem 2019 needs?
Where I can watch it?Again, Amazon, YouTube and Google Play have it for less than a cup of coffee. If you live in the UK it is also on SkyCinema
In 36 years Marilyn Monroe achieved a kind of fame that had never been seen before. Gone was Norma Jean and in her place was the myth of Marilyn Monroe; unprecedented, unparalleled and unbreakable.
Seriously, even death couldn’t stop the juggernaut that was Monroe!
It’s now 55 years on from her death and Marilyn’s finger prints are still all over our everyday life, from lipstick lines to shitty faux inspirational Facebook quote posts. But Marilyn’s impact is so much more than that!!
You see, Marilyn’s legacy is bigger than you, me, or her….it’s what it is to be a woman.
The Marilyn Meat Market
Marilyn Monroe died at home on the 5th August 1962. Immediately paparazzi swarmed her house, desperate to get that hot body bag shot – now I’m not saying Paps are scum bags…but here’s what one was over heard saying:
‘I’m just as sorry as the next fellow about Marilyn Monroe. But as long as she had to do it, what a break she did it in August.’
Oh cool, so you’re the biggest wanker ever then. via giphy
But this wasn’t new…Marilyn had always been free game. After arriving in Hollywood, she posed naked for $50, with the understanding the pictures would never be printed (and that she now had money to eat- hooray!)
Flash forward to 1953; the nudes are sold without Marilyn’s knowledge to one Hugh Hefner, who uses them to launch his new magazine Playboy… Classy.
But it wasn’t just Mr Hefner skeezing it up, incredibly explicit pictures of Marilyn –obvs taken without her permission – were not rare. Photographers tried to get up the skirt shots all the time!
Even the most iconic image of Marilyn, was a cheap paparazzi photo op.
Not a still from The Seven Year Itch, but a publicity op for punters to get a shot up Marilyn’s skirt (see creep with a camera behind…)
As Marilyn put it:
“My popularity seems almost entirely a masculine phenomenon.”
And it was. Unlike other female stars of the era, most of Marilyn’s media cuttings came directly from men. Similarly, the majority of books written about her have male authors.
The most obvious reason for this would be the kind of woman that Marilyn portrayed. A breathy mix of woman and child; malleable and rescue-able in equal measure.
Perhaps its this lack of on screen autonomy that is the reason that the media took so many more liberties with Marilyn than they did with her peers.. and 55 years on from her death, they continue to do so!
Those naked Playboy pictures still get paraded about every time Playboy has an anniversary. Private photos of Marilyn constantly go up for auction (to then be featured in celeb gossip magazines)
AND in February 2017 tabloids reached never before seen heights of bullshittery when they released images that ‘proved’ a woman who had been dead for 50+ years, had at some point possibly been ‘secretly pregnant’.
Actual Daily Mail headline…
As with any tabloid starlet, it’s Marilyn’s body that she is most known for. With journalists in both 1950’s America and 2017’s America desperate to know just how she gets that body (see an August 2017 Buzzfeed piece which tests modern audiences against Marilyn’s daily routine, as told by a 1952 magazine.)
But why are we still so obsessed with Marilyn’s ass, tits and well….more.
I didn’t even know neck measurements were a thing..
Well two key reasons:
Marilyn was crazy beautiful!
Marilyn died crazy young!
Really, Marilyn’s story is one as old as Hollywood: Beautiful woman. Dies young. Sad times all around. The end right?
Well…no. See Marilyn’s death is different. Because much like her life, it was made to revolve around men
Thats right, I’m about to get on my little feminism high horse!
As with much of the literature we have on her life, the majority of writing on Marilyn’s death was written by men. Most of her obituaries were written by men (focusing on her sexuality, emotional damage, female form and love life) and the majority of theories surrounding her death are too written by men!
Here are just a few of the common theories around why/how Marilyn died:
Assassinated by John F Kennedy
Assassinated by Bobby Kennedy
Killed by the CIA/FBI to pressurize the Kennedys
Murdered by the CIA because Marilyn knew the truth about aliens!!!
Bar the whole aliens thing (and the obvious fact that Marilyn died from an overdose and none of the above…) all the prominent theories surrounding Marilyn’s death revolve around her relationships with men and her role as a sex bomb (literally in this case…)
These theories work to fit Marilyn into a specific narrative, emphasising her tragic femininity and sexual willingness.
Basically… it’s the plot of a film noir; attractive but damaged dame gets killed because she had sex with the wrong guy.
Same. But stay with me, it gets less bleak!
It seems strange that a figure so integral to how we see femininity, wasn’t addressed by women. But don’t worry, thats all changing!
In 1986, Glora Stienham released a biography, Marilyn, re-exmaining how we see Ms Monroe.
From there, it’s only been up and up. There’s been a huge turn in how historians view Marilyn and in the last 20 years more Marilyn books books than ever have been written by women. Huuuuuuge win!!
Thats right Hermione! More books to read!!!
So what can we expect to see in this brave new dawn of Marilyn’s tale?
Well expect more research into Marilyn’s political views (…aside from which Kennedy brother was hotter…le sigh)
Marilyn’s political views really let her working class roots shine through. She was a founding member of the Committee for a Sane Nuclear Policy and an elected member of the liberal caucus.
She was also open about her support of communism in Cuba and to be honest it is a bloody wonder she wasn’t bought up on that!!
Not only this, but Marilyn was an ardent supporter of civil rights.
She personally fought for Ella Fitzgerald to perform at whites only hot spot, The Morecambe Club. Arguing that Ella be allowed a regular spot and offering to sit front row for each performance (bringing the club and Ella tons of publicity!)
Ella personally credited this with getting her out of small time jazz clubs and getting her career in the mainstream. The two women remained friends until Marilyn’s death.
Ella and Marilyn at The Morecambe Club
We’ve barley scratched the surface of who history’s most infamous blonde bombshell was, and I know I can’t wait to find out more!
This was really interesting, where can I find out more?Theres tons of really cracking books, but I’d suggest checking out Gloria Stienham’s book, Marilyn (she also has a couple of online essays on Marilyn that you can read for free!)
Like any superhero, Wonder Woman has a pretty complicated origin story.
Born out of both feminism and misogyny, Diana Prince was the creation of psychologist Dr. William Moulton Marston.
The good doctor had been bought in by DC (the famed comics powerhouse) to create a female superhero that would silence critics who called DC sexist and overly masculine.
Wonder Woman first appeared in 1941 and her unique brand of red white and blue heroism seemed like just the feminist super hero DC needed.
Original concept art for Wonder Woman
The creator of Wonder Woman, Dr. William Moulton Marston was a self confessed staunch feminist…just the kind of ‘feminist’ that might happily crack: ‘get back in the kitchen and make me a sandwich’ jokes (we’ll get to that!)
For his era Marsten was a new type of man, he talked about gender equality and believed in things like, female contraception. He also had some pretty radical feminist theories; believing that women were the superior sex, held back by being housewives.
He also led a progressive life for the time, living with both his wife, Elizabeth Holloway Marsten and lover, Olive Byrne. To avoid scandal, the trio told outsiders that Olive was their widowed sister…who just happened to give birth to Marsten’s kids.
Yeah. I’m sure that excuse totally flew…
Olive and Elizabeth were children of the suffrage movement, with Olive’s mother having both opened the USA’s first contraception clinic and been the first woman in the US to go on hunger strike as part of the fight for suffrage. Elizabeth meanwhile, was 1 of just 3 women to graduate in her law class.
Olive, Elizabeth and Dr Marsten test out a lie detector (which btw Elizabeth and Marsten created…)
On top of living with 2 incredibly strong women and holding some strong feminisit views, Marsten was pretty sexually liberal (which you probably got from the whole, living with both wife AND lover, thing) and an ardent member of the BDSM community.
ALL of this trickled into Wonder Woman.,,,
Believe me when I say, Wonder Woman spent a lot of her time tied up, manacled, chained and gagged.
Though she used her lasso of truth to pin down bad guys, her main source of weakness was being captured and tied up…because…reasons.
Marsten was always hands on with his work, BUT he was particularly specific around art work that showed Wonder Woman bound (no idea why…)
His heroine was seen trussed up and tied in almost every issue, with Marsten enthusiastically telling his editors:
‘Women enjoy submission’
But not all women did. Dorothy Roubicek, the first female editor at DC, took issue with Wonder Woman’s treatment. Marsten shrugged off her concerns, explaining that:
‘Of course I wouldn’t expect Miss Roubicek to understand this…has been in comics only 6 months or so, hasn’t she?’
see what I meant about the sandwich jokes?
But despite all of this, Wonder Woman’s origin story remained revolutionary for the time.
Ok – Yes, part of the reason she leaves her home and comes to America, is because she falls in love with a man. BUT he also goes because she’s heard that America is one of earths last hopes for female equality and that there’s a whole bunch of men trying to fuck that shit up; so naturally she needs to stop this through the medium of ass kicking.
A whole lot go ass kicking!!
Marsten said Wonder Woman was created for:
‘The new type of woman who should, I believe, rule the world.’
Now, lets all be in agreement, this is incredibly bad ass for the 1940s! Is it any wonder then that this new type of hero started to inspire girls to become real world heroes?
But all of this amazing arse kicking quickly stopped, when in 1947 Marsten died; his death was pretty much immediately followed by:
1) A psychological study which claimed violence in comics had a detrimental effect on youth. This led to comics putting more emphasis on soapy romantic storylines
2)The Dawn of the Silver Age of comics-which the internet has lovingly dubbed ‘super dickery’ for shit like this:
Fun fact – I have this on my fridge
All this left Wonder Woman without a leader and easy prey to the super-dickery that was now gripping comic books.
And so Wonder Woman spending a lot of the 1950s writing a love advice column and dreaming of marriage, babies and a career as a model.
Wonder Woman, Queen of mind games
But that wasn’t to say Wonder Woman’s initial radicalism had been forgotten! The little girls she had inspired in the 40s were now all grown up and spear heading a new wave of feminism.
Wonder Woman was the cover star of feminist magazine Ms, in 1972. Gloria Stienham explained how vital Diana Prince was to this movement:
‘Wonder Woman symbolizes many of the values of the women’s culture that feminists are now trying to introduce into the mainstream: strength and self-reliance for women; sisterhood and mutual support among women; peacefulness and esteem for human life’
In 1975 Diana Prince set out to inspire a new generation of children, when she made her TV debut with hit live action series ‘Wonder Woman’.
via giphy
But Wonder Woman was more than a TV show, it soon turned into a national debate as to what exactly was proper attire for saving the world – a debate which has continued to this day… just now on a global scale!
The most recent actress to play Wonder Woman, Gal Gadot, has faced plenty of criticism on her costume and physique – during a recent TV interview Gadot was told she was too skinny and flat chested to play Wonder Woman (no i don’t get this logic either).
Fortunately Gal Gadot can read a bitch out, and told the reporter that Amazon women of old actually only had one breast so they could have more space for their bow and arrow.
Sassy and factually accurate, this girl is goals!
Sadly this was far from the first time Diana Prince had to clap back.
In 1942 Wonder Woman was actually banned for a short time, all because of her dress attire!
Wonder Women’s knee high skirt, bodice and knee high boots were seen as incredibly skimpy and likely to induce wide spread ‘lesbianism’ among impressionable young girls.
And Linda Carters 1970s Wonder Woman was as known for her tiny waist and low cut costume as she was her feminism and world saving.
In fact, just this year, Linda Carter had to slam sexism yet again, after Wonder Woman lost an honorary UN ambassador role, following complaints the character was too sexualised.
For those wondering, the UN Ambassador role Wonder Woman lost was to fight gender inequality…
yeah, that makes all the sense
But if we can learn anything from Wonder Woman it’s how to keep on busting walls down despite the adversity. Now with the mammoth success of her solo big screen debut, it looks like Wonder Woman is set to become a hero to a whole new generation of girls.
Born from both suffrage and misogyny, she opened the door for female super heroes in comics, sparked the imaginations of fledgling female leaders and is now kicking the door down on the future of female led blockbusters.
She may be in her 70’s, but Wonder Woman’s got a lot of fight left in her.
And sass. She has so much sass left.
This was interesting, where can i find out more? Jill Lepore has a fantastic book, The Secret History of Wonder Woman, which gives an in depth glimpse into how this iconic character was created and the effect her creator, Dr Masten, has on her. Worth checking out!